From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cl@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mpm@selenic.com,
npiggin@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610205749.GA9321@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090610205026.GC8147@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > > What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat
> > > suggests it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be
> > > much to conflict, except kmemcheck - which has more or less
> > > trivial callbacks there.
> >
> > The conflicting bits are the patches that remove bootmem
> > allocator uses in arch/x86 and kernel/sched.c.
>
> Give me an hour and i'll get some minimal testing done.
This tree doesnt conflict (not even with kmecheck) - and the older
bits you sent against the scheduler and against x86 doesnt apply
anymore - but they do look scary.
How about this: i can send the scheduler and x86 bits to Linus right
now, that should make it possible to have a clean base for you and
no interactions with anything pending?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-10 20:12 [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31 Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-10 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 20:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-10 20:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 0:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 21:00 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-10 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:17 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 11:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 13:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 14:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 15:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 17:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-11 18:10 ` [GIT PULL v3] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 21:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 22:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-12 8:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 7:25 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-12 7:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-12 7:33 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-12 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 23:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-12 8:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:00 ` [GIT PULL] " Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-10 21:11 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090610205749.GA9321@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox