From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761129AbZFKDKT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:10:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755183AbZFKDKI (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:10:08 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:32845 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754402AbZFKDKI (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:10:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:10:05 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Amerigo Wang Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: 2.6.31 -mm merge plans Message-ID: <20090611031005.GU8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20090610115140.09c9f4cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090610190841.GT8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090610121633.d678fc8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4A305A99.70701@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A305A99.70701@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:15:05AM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote: > Hi, Al. > > Just as what I said in the description of that patch, one only has > extern functions that are _only_ used in another as function pointers. Er... So what? Amount of functions made static is not, per se, a useful metrics of anything. > And the size of code can't be a reason why they are seperated, we have > much more source files larger than this one. :) And that's not a good thing...