public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Disable debugging if it increases the minimum page order
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:04:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090611180422.GJ7302@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906111140080.24376@gentwo.org>

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:49:19AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> > My main point is that a lot of _testers_ will probably enable all SLUB
> > debugging by default because we encourage them to and it's pretty bad
> > that we end up causing order 1 allocations and oom conditions.
> 
> Other test methods (like PAGE_ALLOC debugging) also have significant side
> effects.
> 

True, but they come with huge big warnings and I agree that we don't want
to make the SL*B debug warning too drastic, particularly because SL*B
debugging is often so valuable and relatively lightweight in comparison
to some debug options.


> > So I still think we need to fix _at minimum_ the kmalloc-4096 case
> > (assuming Larry won't hit the same problem still). I see you're not
> > happy with my patch so any suggestions how to handle that?
> 
> Add a warning to Kconfig that the higher order page allocations may
> increase with debugging on for caches with object sizes near or equal to
> PAGE_SIZE?
> 

Possibly clueless suggestion here. How possible would it be to implement
something like

"With SLUB_DEBUG, enable debug on all caches unless the increased meta-data
would force the minimum order up on order due to object sizes being near or
equal the PAGE_SIZE. If SLUB_DEBUG must be enabled, specify slub_debug=A for
'All caches enable debug regardless'"

?

> Its good to run with full debugging on for even the 4k sized caches.
> Otherwise we wont be catching overruns there. But the debugging can cause
> some side effects.
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-11 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  8:44 [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Disable debugging if it increases the minimum page order Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 13:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 14:00   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 14:24     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 15:11       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 15:20         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 15:28           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 15:49             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 16:49               ` Larry Finger
2009-06-11 18:04               ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-06-11 18:26                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 19:16                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 14:39     ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090611180422.GJ7302@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox