From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI PM: Read device power state from register after updating it
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:53:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906112153.16853.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090611115458.66650e04@jbarnes-g45>
On Thursday 11 June 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 21:52:29 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 18 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > >
> > > After attempting to change the power state of a PCI device
> > > pci_raw_set_power_state() doesn't check if the value it wrote into
> > > the device's PCI_PM_CTRL register has been stored in there. Still,
> > > it modifies the device's current_state field as though that's the
> > > case. This may cause the driver of the device to think that its
> > > power state has been changed while in fact it hasn't.
> > >
> > > To prevent such situations from happening modify
> > > pci_raw_set_power_state() so that it reads the device's PCI_PM_CTRL
> > > register after writing into it and uses the value read from the
> > > register to update the device's current_state field. Also make it
> > > return -EIO if the new state of the device is not equal to the state
> > > requested by the called.
> > >
> > > To distinguish this error condition from the other ones make
> > > pci_raw_set_power_state() return -ENOSYS instead of -EIO when it is
> > > impossible to change the power state of the device, because it
> > > doesn't support the native PCI PM at all or the requested target
> > > state is not supported by it.
> >
> > Having reconsidered it I think that -ENODEV is probably better than
> > -ENOSYS for this purpose. Updated patch follows.
>
> Applied to linux-next, thanks Rafael.
Please drop. It has been reported by Jiri to cause a regression to happen.
Best,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-18 20:46 [PATCH 0/2] PCI PM: Two patches for 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI PM: Follow PCI_PM_CTRL_NO_SOFT_RESET during transitions from D3 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 18:26 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-05-18 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI PM: Read device power state from register after updating it Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-26 19:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 18:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-11 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-06-11 20:00 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906112153.16853.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox