From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: hard_irqs: handle NR_IRQS > 256 automatically
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:18:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906132318.19208.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A33E892.6010704@zytor.com>
On Saturday 13 June 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If we're going to automatically set HARDIRQ_BITS for the arch, might as
> > well be a little bit smart about it and set it to 9 automatically if
> > NR_IRQS is larger than 8 bits.
> >
>
> Why would the only possible values be 8 or 9?
All architectures that define this either set it to 8 or 9, I chose
8 because it is the more common constant, but I now realized that
we also have (in include/linux/hardirq.h, last touched by Steven):
#define MAX_HARDIRQ_BITS 10
#ifndef HARDIRQ_BITS
# define HARDIRQ_BITS MAX_HARDIRQ_BITS
#endif
#if HARDIRQ_BITS > MAX_HARDIRQ_BITS
#error HARDIRQ_BITS too high!
#endif
Not sure why we even need to make this overridable from the architecture,
10 still seems like a reasonable default that should always work.
I'd suggest we either drop the definition for HARDIRQ_BITS from
asm-generic/hardirq.h, or we use
#ifndef HARDIRQ_BITS
-#define HARDIRQ_BITS 8
+# if NR_IRQS > 255
+# define HARDIRQ_BITS 9
+# elif NR_IRQS > 511
+# define HARDIRQ_BITS 10
+# elif NR_IRQS > 1023
+# warning too many interrupts for HARDIRQ_BITS
+# endif
#endif
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-13 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 14:30 [PATCH] asm-generic: uaccess: fix up local access_ok() usage Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 14:30 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: hard_irqs: handle NR_IRQS > 256 automatically Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-13 21:18 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-06-14 0:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 20:43 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: drop HARDIRQ_BITS definition from hardirq.h Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-15 15:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-15 16:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-15 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-16 14:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-13 15:59 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: uaccess: fix up local access_ok() usage Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 20:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 0:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 10:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906132318.19208.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox