From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:37:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090614093725.GD832@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906130348p474faf57yeb729aa07059c599@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:48:52AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If the port does not support HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS, then they can't support
> > the perf_counter_open syscall either. ??Rather than forcing everyone to add
> > an ignore (or suffer the warning until they get around to implementing
> > support), only whine about the syscall when applicable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>
> Andrew: could you pick this up since Ingo acked it now ?
I fail to see why this is necessary? cond_syscall() takes care of this in
the not implemented case, the same as every other syscall backing some
feature that has yet to be implemented.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-14 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 11:29 [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:41 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-12 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 17:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 15:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-13 10:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 9:37 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-06-14 9:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:11 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-14 10:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 11:20 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-14 11:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 11:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090614093725.GD832@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox