From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] asm-generic: drop HARDIRQ_BITS definition from hardirq.h
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:43:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906142243.32409.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906131725l214007fcpfa90e72b03cad2ac@mail.gmail.com>
linux/hardirq.h contains a fallback for HARDIRQ_BITS to 10
if it's not defined, so it is pointless to define a default
of 8 in asm/hardirq.h. There does not seem to be a good
reason why an architecture would want to limit the number
of hardirqs this way.
Reported-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
include/asm-generic/hardirq.h | 13 -------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
On Sunday 14 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> is there any downsides to using a "too large" value ? i.e. if my
> system has less than 256, does it make any difference at all if it's
> set to 10 ?
> -mike
None that I know of. I'm queuing this patch in my asm-generic tree now,
unless Steven or someone else has a better idea.
Arnd <><
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h b/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
index 3d5d2c9..23bb4da 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
@@ -11,19 +11,6 @@ typedef struct {
#include <linux/irq_cpustat.h> /* Standard mappings for irq_cpustat_t above */
-#ifndef HARDIRQ_BITS
-#define HARDIRQ_BITS 8
-#endif
-
-/*
- * The hardirq mask has to be large enough to have
- * space for potentially all IRQ sources in the system
- * nesting on a single CPU:
- */
-#if (1 << HARDIRQ_BITS) < NR_IRQS
-# error HARDIRQ_BITS is too low!
-#endif
-
#ifndef ack_bad_irq
static inline void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
--
1.6.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-14 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 14:30 [PATCH] asm-generic: uaccess: fix up local access_ok() usage Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 14:30 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: hard_irqs: handle NR_IRQS > 256 automatically Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-13 21:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 0:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 20:43 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-06-15 15:59 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: drop HARDIRQ_BITS definition from hardirq.h Steven Rostedt
2009-06-15 16:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-15 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-16 14:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-13 15:59 ` [PATCH] asm-generic: uaccess: fix up local access_ok() usage Mike Frysinger
2009-06-13 20:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 0:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 10:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906142243.32409.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox