From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
mingo@elte.hu, yinghai@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:26:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090615082636.GA30964@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615081831.GA5411@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:16:30PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > I dropped the GFP_WAIT conversion patch and added the gfp masking patch
> > you liked. I tested this on x86-64 with both SLAB and SLUB.
>
> Hi Pekka,
>
> I tried to convert some of the early allocations on s390. Some callsites
> however need to have the GFP_DMA flag, since we need to allocate memory below
> 2GB. Passing GFP_DMA causes this crash:
>
> <1>Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address fffffffffffff000
> <4>Oops: 0038 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> <4>Modules linked in:
> <4>CPU: 0 Not tainted 2.6.30-03984-g45e3e19-dirty #233
> <4>Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 00000000006a2ef0, ksp: 0000000000718000)
> <4>Krnl PSW : 0700100180000000 00000000000808ee (queue_work_on+0x8e/0xe0)
> <4> R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:0 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:1 PM:0 EA:3
> <4>Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 00000000006b8b88
> <4> 00000000006b8b88 0000000000000001 0000000000000008 0000000000000200
> <4> 000000003fe28000 0000000000008001 00000000011da730 0000000000717ca0
> <4> 00000000006b8b88 0000000000488650 0000000000717cd0 0000000000717ca0
> <4>Krnl Code: 00000000000808de: e310d0000082 xg %r1,0(%r13)
> <4> 00000000000808e4: eb220003000d sllg %r2,%r2,3
> <4> 00000000000808ea: b9040034 lgr %r3,%r4
> <4> >00000000000808ee: e32210000004 lg %r2,0(%r2,%r1)
> <4> 00000000000808f4: c0e5ffffff28 brasl %r14,80744
> <4> 00000000000808fa: a7280001 lhi %r2,1
> <4> 00000000000808fe: e340b0b80004 lg %r4,184(%r11)
> <4> 0000000000080904: b9140022 lgfr %r2,%r2
> <4>Call Trace:
> <4>([<000000003fe28000>] 0x3fe28000)
> <4> [<0000000000080e96>] queue_work+0x62/0xa4
> <4> [<0000000000080f26>] schedule_work+0x4e/0x60
> <4> [<0000000000132f7e>] dma_kmalloc_cache+0x1ca/0x1d0
> <4> [<00000000001330ae>] get_slab+0x12a/0x130
> <4> [<00000000001337b6>] __kmalloc+0x5e/0x364
> <4> [<0000000000739132>] con3215_init+0x1c2/0x2e4
> <4> [<00000000007333ea>] console_init+0x42/0x5c
> <4> [<0000000000718e50>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x6b8
> <4> [<0000000000012020>] _ehead+0x20/0x80
>
> I didn't look any deeper into this, but looks to me like doing something like
> schedule_work() this early isn't ok.
>
> This is the conversion that leads to the crash:
>
> - alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(struct raw3215_info));
> + kzalloc(sizeof(struct raw3215_info), GFP_NOWAIT | GFP_DMA);
>
> Might be that I missed something. Maybe some special flag?
No, just a bug in the conversion.
If you predicate the schedule_work call on slab_state == SYSFS, then
it should work (when sysfs comes up later in init, previously added
slabs will be registered with sysfs).
Oh, and you'd need to also not pass __SYSFS_ADD_DEFERRED into
kmem_cache_create in that case too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 13:25 [GIT PULL] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31 Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 13:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 16:16 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-14 7:12 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-15 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 14:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-15 18:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 8:26 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-06-15 8:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 10:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 9:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 12:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-15 13:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-16 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 16:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 21:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 10:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:28 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 5:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-17 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-18 2:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 6:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-18 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 22:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090615082636.GA30964@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox