From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761187AbZFOONc (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:13:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751689AbZFOONY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:13:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52855 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751681AbZFOONX (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:13:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:12:10 -0400 From: Jason Baron To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, jiayingz@google.com, bligh@google.com, roland@redhat.com, fche@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] add syscall tracepoints Message-ID: <20090615141209.GA3126@redhat.com> References: <0ee4090012cf46f25d8cd8b022746a43b99d5767.1244837725.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <20090612215726.GA9177@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090612215726.GA9177@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:57:26PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Introduce a new 'DECLARE_TRACE_REG()' macro, so that tracepoints can associate > > an external register/unregister function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron > > > > --- > > include/linux/tracepoint.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > index 14df7e6..9a3660b 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct tracepoint { > > * not add unwanted padding between the beginning of the section and the > > * structure. Force alignment to the same alignment as the section start. > > */ > > -#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \ > > +#define DECLARE_TRACE_REG(name, proto, args, reg, unreg) \ > > extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \ > > static inline void trace_##name(proto) \ > > { \ > > @@ -71,13 +71,29 @@ struct tracepoint { > > } \ > > static inline int register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \ > > { \ > > - return tracepoint_probe_register(#name, (void *)probe); \ > > + int ret; \ > > + void (*func)(void) = (void (*)(void))reg; \ > > + \ > > + ret = tracepoint_probe_register(#name, (void *)probe); \ > > + if (func && !ret) \ > > + func(); \ > > I don't see why you need to add this weird interface when all you really > need to do is to call the function to set the TIF flags explicitly in > reg_event_syscall_enter when registering a tracepoint. > > Mathieu > I could enable the TIF flag in reg_event_syscall_enter, however that would not manage the TIF flag for other users of these traceoints. When users 'register/unregister' with a tracepoint, they expect the tracepoint to be enabled/disabled. If we move this functionality to the user, we are changing how that interface works. Therefore, I associated the enabling/disabling of the tracepoint, with the tracepoint definition. thanks, -Jason