From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935752AbZFOVhW (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:37:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934990AbZFOVhJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:37:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39555 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934762AbZFOVhI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:37:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:32:16 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] posix-cpu-timers: random fixes rework -v3 Message-ID: <20090615213216.GA22766@redhat.com> References: <20090615103640.4b828cc4@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090615103640.4b828cc4@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/15, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Two fixes related with posix-cpu-timers I think both patches are good. But, to avoid the possible confusion, the second one does not fix any bug. Oleg.