From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug in tty ldisc and friends
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090616104559.GA29880@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090616103435.GI5139@amd.com>
* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:29:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > We are now well below the limit for stack-trace entries.
> >
> > This is something we noticed recently: dma-debug uses a lot of
> > lock classes and thus creates a really large lock-graph,
> > depleting the reserves quickly.
>
> Is this considered a problem? I increased the hash-size to 1024
> for performance reasons (== 1024 spin_locks). But if it hurts to
> much in other places this can be reverted.
Lockdep running out of stack slots is a problem - but we dont want
to revert your patch: lockdep is really a helper to development, it
just observes, never hinders changes like that.
The good news is that the (untested) patch i sent should largely
solve this problem and reduce dma-debug's lockdep footprint by a
factor of 1024.
Reverting your change would only be a workaround really.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 5:45 bug in tty ldisc and friends Steven Rostedt
2009-06-16 8:37 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 8:57 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:04 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-16 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-16 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 11:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-16 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 15:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-17 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-17 14:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 14:28 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090616104559.GA29880@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox