From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] ntp updates for 2.6.31
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:26:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617172601.GA3493@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617172325.GA32332@localhost>
* Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
> Still, I'd really like to see the original behavior restored. Most
> of the users complaining about slow convergence are probably just
> hitting the calibration problem, which needs to be fixed by other
> means than making PLL faster. Also, users of other systems seem to
> be happy with their slow convergence. At least that's the
> impression I have from NTP lists.
Wouldnt the goal be to calibrate as fast as possible? (Without any
bad oscillation)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 14:06 [GIT pull] ntp updates for 2.6.31 Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15 20:16 ` john stultz
2009-06-15 23:41 ` john stultz
2009-06-16 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 11:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-16 12:52 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-17 15:38 ` John Stultz
2009-06-17 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 17:23 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-17 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-17 17:55 ` John Stultz
2009-06-18 12:13 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-23 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 13:16 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-23 13:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 14:33 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-23 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 19:49 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2009-06-23 21:41 ` john stultz
2009-06-24 9:29 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-24 13:39 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617172601.GA3493@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox