From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] ring-buffer: check for less than two in size allocation
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:25:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617232630.249960331@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090617232555.164629684@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0004-ring-buffer-check-for-less-than-two-in-size-allocati.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
The ring buffer must have at least two pages allocated for the
reader page swap to work.
The page count check will miss the case of a zero size passed in.
Even though a zero size ring buffer would probably fail an allocation,
making the min size check for less than two instead of equal to one makes
the code a bit more robust.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 162da23..2e99dba 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ struct ring_buffer *__ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size, unsigned flags,
buffer->reader_lock_key = key;
/* need at least two pages */
- if (buffer->pages == 1)
- buffer->pages++;
+ if (buffer->pages < 2)
+ buffer->pages = 2;
/*
* In case of non-hotplug cpu, if the ring-buffer is allocated
--
1.6.3.1
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 23:25 [PATCH 0/7] [GIT PULL][for 2.6.31] ring-buffer: various clean ups Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] ring-buffer: use BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE in calculating index Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] ring-buffer: remove useless warn on check Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] ring-buffer: remove useless compile check for buffer_page size Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:25 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-06-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] ring-buffer: add locks around rb_per_cpu_empty Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] ring-buffer: do not grab locks in nmi Steven Rostedt
2009-06-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] ring-buffer: have benchmark test print to trace buffer Steven Rostedt
2009-06-20 15:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] [GIT PULL][for 2.6.31] ring-buffer: various clean ups Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617232630.249960331@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox