public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] function-graph: disable when both x86_32 and optimize for size are configured
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:45:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090621104527.GA22961@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906201822320.20813@gandalf.stny.rr.com>


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > > index 4a13e5a..1eac852 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ config FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > >  	bool "Kernel Function Graph Tracer"
> > >  	depends on HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > >  	depends on FUNCTION_TRACER
> > > +	depends on !X86_32 || !CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> > >  	default y
> > 
> > Hm, nice fix, but this is a quite nasty constraint - distros like to 
> > enable CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE as it neatly trims the kernel's size by 
> > about 30%.
> > 
> > Just in case you have not checked yet: is there no way to turn off 
> > the specific gcc optimization that causes this? Or is it -Os itself 
> > that does this optimization?
> 
> It seems to me that -Os causes it for i386. I did a make V=1 to 
> capture how the files in question were being compiled, and tried 
> various disabling of flags. -Os was the only one to make a 
> difference. :-(

oh well. I think GCC should be fixed/improved to not do this 
particular (rather narrow looking) optimization if -pg is specified 
too.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-21 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-18 22:44 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][for 2.6.31] function graph gcc issue Steven Rostedt
2009-06-18 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] function-graph: disable when both x86_32 and optimize for size are configured Steven Rostedt
2009-06-20 16:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-20 22:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-21 10:45       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-18 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] function-graph: add stack frame test Steven Rostedt
2009-06-19  4:11   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-06-20 16:26 ` [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][for 2.6.31] function graph gcc issue Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090621104527.GA22961@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox