From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:21:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090622172123.GE15600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3F3648.7080007@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:44:08PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Preempt the ongoing non-rt ioq if there are rt ioqs waiting for dispatching
> in ancestor or sibling groups. It will give other group's rt ioq an chance
> to dispatch ASAP.
>
Hi Gui,
Will new preempton logic of traversing up the hiearchy so that both new
queue and old queue are at same level to take a preemption decision not
take care of above scenario?
Please have a look at bfq_find_matching_entity().
At the same time we probably don't want to preempt the non-rt queue
with an RT queue in sibling group until and unless sibling group is an
RT group.
root
/ \
BEgrpA BEgrpB
| |
BEioq1 RTioq2
Above we got two BE group A and B and assume ioq in group A is being
served and then an RT request in group B comes. Because group B is an
BE class group, we should not preempt the queue in group A.
Thanks
Vivek
> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> block/elevator-fq.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> block/elevator-fq.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
> index 2ad40eb..80526fd 100644
> --- a/block/elevator-fq.c
> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
> @@ -3245,8 +3245,16 @@ void elv_add_ioq_busy(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct io_queue *ioq)
> elv_mark_ioq_busy(ioq);
> efqd->busy_queues++;
> if (elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq)) {
> + struct io_entity *entity;
> struct io_group *iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
> +
> iog->busy_rt_queues++;
> + entity = iog->entity.parent;
> +
> + for_each_entity(entity) {
> + iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
> + iog->sub_busy_rt_queues++;
> + }
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_GROUP_IOSCHED
> @@ -3290,9 +3298,18 @@ void elv_del_ioq_busy(struct elevator_queue *e, struct io_queue *ioq,
> elv_clear_ioq_busy(ioq);
> BUG_ON(efqd->busy_queues == 0);
> efqd->busy_queues--;
> +
> if (elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq)) {
> + struct io_entity *entity;
> struct io_group *iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
> +
> iog->busy_rt_queues--;
> + entity = iog->entity.parent;
> +
> + for_each_entity(entity) {
> + iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
> + iog->sub_busy_rt_queues--;
> + }
> }
>
> elv_deactivate_ioq(efqd, ioq, requeue);
> @@ -3735,12 +3752,32 @@ int elv_iosched_expire_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int slice_expired,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int check_rt_queue(struct io_queue *ioq)
> +{
> + struct io_group *iog;
> + struct io_entity *entity;
> +
> + iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
> +
> + if (iog->busy_rt_queues)
> + return 1;
> +
> + entity = iog->entity.parent;
> +
> + for_each_entity(entity) {
> + iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
> + if (iog->sub_busy_rt_queues)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Common layer function to select the next queue to dispatch from */
> void *elv_fq_select_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int force)
> {
> struct elv_fq_data *efqd = &q->elevator->efqd;
> struct io_queue *new_ioq = NULL, *ioq = elv_active_ioq(q->elevator);
> - struct io_group *iog;
> int slice_expired = 1;
>
> if (!elv_nr_busy_ioq(q->elevator))
> @@ -3811,12 +3848,9 @@ void *elv_fq_select_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int force)
> /*
> * If we have a RT cfqq waiting, then we pre-empt the current non-rt
> * cfqq.
> - *
> - * TODO: This does not seem right across the io groups. Fix it.
> */
> - iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
>
> - if (!elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq) && iog->busy_rt_queues) {
> + if (!elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq) && check_rt_queue(ioq)) {
> /*
> * We simulate this as cfqq timed out so that it gets to bank
> * the remaining of its time slice.
> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
> index b3193f8..be6c1af 100644
> --- a/block/elevator-fq.h
> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct io_group {
> * non-RT cfqq in service when this value is non-zero.
> */
> unsigned int busy_rt_queues;
> + unsigned int sub_busy_rt_queues;
>
> int deleting;
> unsigned short iocg_id;
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 20:37 [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 01/20] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 8:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 12:43 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 2:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 4:10 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 7:32 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-23 13:42 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 2:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 2:20 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-30 6:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01 1:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01 9:24 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 03/20] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 04/20] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 05/20] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-29 5:27 ` [PATCH] io-controller: optimization for iog deletion when elevator exiting Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-29 14:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 17:14 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-01 1:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 12:10 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 7:49 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Don't expire an idle ioq if it's the only ioq in hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01 1:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01 1:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 1:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 21:52 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-25 10:23 ` [PATCH] io-controller: do some changes of io.policy interface Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-25 12:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-26 0:27 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 0:59 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 19/20] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 7:44 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 17:21 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-06-23 6:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 9:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] io-controller: Prepare a rt ioq list in efqd to keep track of busy rt ioqs Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] io-controller: make rt preemption happen in the whole hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-21 15:21 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 15:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 15:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 16:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 17:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 6:52 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-29 16:04 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-06-29 17:23 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090622172123.GE15600@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox