From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759058AbZFWLMU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:12:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753078AbZFWLMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:12:08 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:43010 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752751AbZFWLMH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:12:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:12:10 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: merging the per-bdi writeback patchset Message-ID: <20090623111209.GZ31415@kernel.dk> References: <20090623081156.GT31415@kernel.dk> <20090623110933.GA16565@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090623110933.GA16565@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 23 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:11:56AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Things are looking good for this patchset and it's been in -next for > > almost a week without any reports of problems. So I'd like to merge it > > for 2.6.31 if at all possible. Any objections? > > Last time we discussed this you said you're happy with 2.6.32. I really > want to take a more detailed look and put that on the not so urgent list > because ou didn't seem to rush for .31. So my vote goes for waiting a > bit longer. Yeah, 2.6.32 works for me too, .31 would have been nice though so I don't have to carry it around anymore. But either is fine, if you and Andrew want more time to review this stuff, then lets just settle for .32. -- Jens Axboe