From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: kerneloops.org report for the week of June 14 2009
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:55:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623115510.GC9497@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906231201430.2767@localhost.localdomain>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Rank 3: getnstimeofday (warning)
> > Reported 309 times (2446 total reports)
> > [suspend resume] getnstimeofday() is called before timekeeping is
> resumed
>
> > Rank 6: hres_timers_resume (warning)
> > Reported 188 times (1024 total reports)
> > [suspend resume] hres_timers_resume() is incorrectly called with
> > interrupts on
>
> Both have the same root cause. Something enables interrupts in the
> early resume path. IIRC, there was a culprit identified recently.
> Rafael ?
This can be debugged automatically today, using lockdep, by using a
'helper lock':
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lockdep_map, helper_lock);
Then mark the lock irq-safe by doing something like:
static void mark_lock_irqsafe(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
int cpu;
local_irq_save(flags);
irq_enter(0);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
lock_acquire(&per_cpu(helper_lock, cpu), 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 0);
lock_release(&per_cpu(helper_lock, cpu), 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 0);
}
irq_exit(0);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
Then, the resume path, when it disables irqs, you can disallow
irq-enable via:
local_irq_disable();
lock_acquire(&__get_cpu_var(helper_lock), 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 0);
...
<extensive suspend or resume codepaths, callbacks>
...
lock_release(&__get_cpu_var(helper_lock), 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 0);
local_irq_enable();
And lockdep will warn if any function inbetween enables IRQs, by
emitting a splat about incorrectly enabled hardirqs. It will warn
about the specific place and will emit a relevant backtrace, - not
just the handler in general.
This should work just fine with current lockdep facilities.
Rafael?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 0:33 kerneloops.org report for the week of June 14 2009 Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-15 5:53 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2009-06-15 7:06 ` Stefan Schmidt
2009-06-16 7:11 ` WARN_ON's in i915_gem_tiling.c Stefan Schmidt
2009-06-18 17:08 ` kerneloops.org report for the week of June 14 2009 Bob Copeland
2009-06-19 5:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-28 9:11 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-23 10:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-23 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-23 14:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-23 16:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-23 16:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-25 13:03 ` Pádraig Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090623115510.GC9497@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox