From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
kernel@wantstofly.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:58:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623125832.GA6872@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090623093208.GD23698@elte.hu>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch is a version of RCU designed for (!SMP && EMBEDDED)
> > > provided as a proof of concept of a small-footprint RCU implementation.
> > > In particular, the implementation of synchronize_rcu() is extremely
> > > lightweight and high performance. It passes rcutorture testing in each
> > > of the four relevant configurations (combinations of NO_HZ and PREEMPT)
> > > on x86. This saves 1263 bytes compared to Classic RCU, and more than
> > > three kilobytes compared to Hierarchical RCU (updated to 2.6.30):
> >
> > On FRV:
> >
> > CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 2616 184 0 2800 af0 kernel/rcuclassic.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 4068 384 0 4452 1164 kernel/rcutree.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 836 32 20 888 378 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 816 24 0 840 348 kernel/rcutiny.o
> >
> > On MN10300:
> >
> > CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 900 28 48 976 3d0 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 1777 184 0 1961 7a9 kernel/rcuclassic.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 900 28 48 976 3d0 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 2733 384 0 3117 c2d kernel/rcutree.o
> >
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 961 28 48 1037 40d kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 3314 128 8 3450 d7a kernel/rcupreempt.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 865 28 48 941 3ad kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 500 24 0 524 20c kernel/rcutiny.o
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com
>
> Ok, that's more convincing than 900 bytes on x86.
It used to be 900 bytes. In 2.6.30, it is 1263 bytes. ;-)
That said, I agree that FRV and MN10300 savings are more impressive.
> Paul, i guess this is .32 material anyway, right?
I am personally OK with it being .32, as long as David Howells,
Lennert Buytenhek, and Paul Mundt are OK with that schedule.
> Since there's plenty of time, could we perhaps also do the
> classic-rcu removal and integrate-rcupreempt-into-tree-rcu steps, to
> reduce the (significant) config complexity perhaps?
Classic-RCU removal most certainly. I am hoping to get the
integrate-rcupreempt-into-tree-rcu piece done in .32 timeframe, but
there is a chance that it may be a bit later.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 4:24 [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 9:12 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 12:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-06-23 13:46 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-23 14:07 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 15:47 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-06-23 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip] " Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 16:39 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090623125832.GA6872@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox