From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, kernel@wantstofly.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:39:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623163939.GE26674@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090623161217.GA15298@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:12:17AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This patch is a -tip version of RCU designed for (!SMP && EMBEDDED)
> provided as a proof of concept of a small-footprint RCU implementation.
> In particular, the implementation of synchronize_rcu() is extremely
> lightweight and high performance. It passes rcutorture testing in each
> of the four relevant configurations (combinations of NO_HZ and PREEMPT)
> on x86. This saves 1263 bytes compared to Classic RCU, and more than
> three kilobytes compared to Hierarchical RCU (updated to 2.6.30):
>
[snip]
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 4:24 [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 9:12 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 12:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 13:46 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-23 14:07 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 15:47 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-06-23 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip] " Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 16:39 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090623163939.GE26674@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox