public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add checksum selftest
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:14:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906241614.02615.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245850289-6673-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>

On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Start a checksum internal testsuite for arch porters and people mucking
> about in the checksum code -- regressions are bad.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> ---
> Arnd: i've tested this on my Blackfin and it seems to work ... can you
> check for any places i missed little endian swapping ?

Endian swapping looks correct, and I like the patch a lot in general,
but:

> +
> +/*
> + * The do_csum() interface is "internal" to the generic checksum code.
> + * Do not require it if the arch has not switched over.
> + */
> +extern unsigned short do_csum(const unsigned char *buff, int len);

Just nitpicking: this prototype should to into asm-generic/checksum.h,
extern declarations have no place in .c files.

> +static unsigned char __initdata do_csum_data1[] = {
> +	0x20,
> +};
> +static unsigned char __initdata do_csum_data2[] = {
> +	0x0d, 0x0a,
> +};
> +static unsigned char __initdata do_csum_data3[] = {
> +	0xff, 0xfb, 0x01,
> +};

You define separate test vectors for each of the three
cases, which looks like it could be optimized by reusing
the same test vectors for each case.

> +static struct csum_partial_data __initdata csum_partial_data[] = {
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(1,  0x00000074, 0x0),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(2,  0x00000a0d, 0x0),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(3,  0x0000fe00, 0x0),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(5,  0x00005084, 0x0),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(8,  0x1101eefe, 0x11016a80),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(8b, 0x00008781, 0x847e),
> +	CSUM_PARTIAL_DATA(9,  0x1101eefe, 0x11016b80),
> +};

For partial checksums, the result has to be folded into a 16-bit
number using csum_fold(), because csum_partial and other functions
return a 32-bit __wsum that can take many equivalent values taht
are all correct.

> +static int __init csum_tcpudp_nofold_selftest(void)
> +{
> +	int i, ret;
> +	unsigned short tret, eret;
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(csum_tcpudp_nofold_data); ++i) {
> +		eret = le16_to_cpu(csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].ret);
> +		tret = csum_tcpudp_nofold(
> +			csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].saddr,
> +			csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].daddr,
> +			csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].len,
> +			csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].proto,
> +			csum_tcpudp_nofold_data[i].sum);
> +		if (tret != eret) {
> +			pr_err("%s: test %i: %#x != %#x: FAIL\n",
> +				__func__, i, tret, eret);
> +			ret = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

same here, but you can easily use csum_tcpudp_magic() instead of
csum_tcpudp_nofold here.

Thanks,

	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-24 13:31 [PATCH] add checksum selftest Mike Frysinger
2009-06-24 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-06-24 14:45   ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-24 15:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-24 19:43       ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-25 10:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-06  8:12           ` Michal Simek
2009-07-06  8:24             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-06  8:51               ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906241614.02615.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox