[patch 3/3] cpufreq: Define dbs_mutex purpose and cleanup its usage conservative gov

venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-06-25T18:44:28Z

[-- Attachment #1: 0003-cpufreq-Define-dbs_mutex-purpose-and-cleanup-its-us.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3077 bytes --]

Commit b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a although it was very
much needed to cleanup ondemand timer cleanly, openup a can of worms
related to locking dependencies in cpufreq.

Patch here defines the need for dbs_mutex and cleans up its usage in
conservative governor. This also resolves the lockdep warnings in
conservative governor which would be similar to one reported here

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.1/01925.html

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 7fc58af..581d057 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -70,15 +70,14 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */

/*
- * DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
- * lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
- * dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
- * (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
- * cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
- * is recursive for the same process. -Venki
- * DEADLOCK ALERT! (2) : do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it
- * would deadlock with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper
- * raceless workqueue teardown.
+ * dbs_mutex protects data in dbs_tuners_ins from concurrent changes on
+ * different CPUs. It also serializes dbs_enable usage in CPUFREQ_GOV_START
+ * and CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP.
+ *
+ * dbs_mutex should be always held after lock_policy_rwsem whenever needed.
+ * do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it would deadlock
+ * with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper raceless
+ * workqueue teardown.
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex);

@@ -590,15 +589,16 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
&dbs_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
}
- dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
-
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);

+ dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
+
break;

case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
- mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
dbs_timer_exit(this_dbs_info);
+
+ mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &dbs_attr_group);
dbs_enable--;

@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
break;

case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
- mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
@@ -625,7 +624,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);

break;
}
--
1.6.0.6

--