From: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
To: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
"Thomas Renninger" <trenn@suse.de>,
"Venkatesh Pallipadi" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 3/3] cpufreq: Define dbs_mutex purpose and cleanup its usage conservative gov
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:33:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625183601.645253000@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090625183354.491259000@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: 0003-cpufreq-Define-dbs_mutex-purpose-and-cleanup-its-us.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3077 bytes --]
Commit b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a although it was very
much needed to cleanup ondemand timer cleanly, openup a can of worms
related to locking dependencies in cpufreq.
Patch here defines the need for dbs_mutex and cleans up its usage in
conservative governor. This also resolves the lockdep warnings in
conservative governor which would be similar to one reported here
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.1/01925.html
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 7fc58af..581d057 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -70,15 +70,14 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
/*
- * DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
- * lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
- * dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
- * (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
- * cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
- * is recursive for the same process. -Venki
- * DEADLOCK ALERT! (2) : do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it
- * would deadlock with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper
- * raceless workqueue teardown.
+ * dbs_mutex protects data in dbs_tuners_ins from concurrent changes on
+ * different CPUs. It also serializes dbs_enable usage in CPUFREQ_GOV_START
+ * and CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP.
+ *
+ * dbs_mutex should be always held after lock_policy_rwsem whenever needed.
+ * do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it would deadlock
+ * with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper raceless
+ * workqueue teardown.
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex);
@@ -590,15 +589,16 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
&dbs_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
}
- dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
-
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
+ dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
+
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
- mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
dbs_timer_exit(this_dbs_info);
+
+ mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &dbs_attr_group);
dbs_enable--;
@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
- mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
@@ -625,7 +624,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
break;
}
--
1.6.0.6
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 18:33 [patch 0/3] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-06-25 18:33 ` [patch 1/3] cpufreq: remove rwsem lock from CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP call (second call site) venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-06-25 18:33 ` [patch 2/3] cpufreq: Define dbs_mutex purpose and cleanup its usage venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-06-25 19:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-06-25 20:54 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-25 21:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-06-25 18:33 ` venkatesh.pallipadi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090625183601.645253000@intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox