public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, earl_chew@agilent.com,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v3)
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:33:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629003328.GB2479@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090625163050.d6a71a13.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

core_pattern: Change how we detect recursive dumps with core_pattern pipes

Change how we detect recursive dumps.  Currently we have a mechanism by which
we try to compare pathnames of the crashing process to the core_pattern path.
This is broken for a dozen reasons, and just doesn't work in any sort of robust
way.  I'm replacing it with the use of a 0 RLIMIT_CORE value.  Since helper
apps set RLIMIT_CORE to zero, we don't write out core files for any process with
that particular limit set.  It the core_pattern is a pipe, any non-zero limit is
translated to RLIM_INFINITY.  This allows complete dumps to be captured, but
prevents infinite recursion in the event that the core_pattern process itself
crashes.

Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Reported-by: Earl Chew <earl_chew@agilent.com>

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9e05bd8..9defd20 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1776,35 +1776,34 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
  	lock_kernel();
 	ispipe = format_corename(corename, signr);
 	unlock_kernel();
-	/*
-	 * Don't bother to check the RLIMIT_CORE value if core_pattern points
-	 * to a pipe.  Since we're not writing directly to the filesystem
-	 * RLIMIT_CORE doesn't really apply, as no actual core file will be
-	 * created unless the pipe reader choses to write out the core file
-	 * at which point file size limits and permissions will be imposed
-	 * as it does with any other process
-	 */
+
  	if (ispipe) {
+		if (core_limit == 0) {
+			 /*
+			  * Normally core limits are irrelevant to pipes, since
+			  * we're not writing to the file system, but we use
+			  * core_limit of 0 here as a speacial value. Any
+			  * non-zero limit gets set to RLIM_INFINITY below, but
+			  * a limit of 0 skips the dump.  This is a consistent
+			  * way to catch recursive crashes.  We can still crash
+			  * if the core_pattern binary sets RLIM_CORE =  !0
+			  * but it runs as root, and can do lots of stupid things
+			  * Note that we use task_tgid_vnr here to grab the pid of the
+			  * process group leader.  That way we get the right pid if a thread
+			  * in a multi-threaded core_pattern process dies.
+			  */
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "Process %d(%s) has RLIMIT_CORE set to 0\n",
+			       task_tgid_vnr(current), current->comm);
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "Aborting core\n");
+			goto fail_unlock;
+		}
+
 		helper_argv = argv_split(GFP_KERNEL, corename+1, &helper_argc);
 		if (!helper_argv) {
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "%s failed to allocate memory\n",
 			       __func__);
 			goto fail_unlock;
 		}
-		/* Terminate the string before the first option */
-		delimit = strchr(corename, ' ');
-		if (delimit)
-			*delimit = '\0';
-		delimit = strrchr(helper_argv[0], '/');
-		if (delimit)
-			delimit++;
-		else
-			delimit = helper_argv[0];
-		if (!strcmp(delimit, current->comm)) {
-			printk(KERN_NOTICE "Recursive core dump detected, "
-					"aborting\n");
-			goto fail_unlock;
-		}
 
 		core_limit = RLIM_INFINITY;
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-29  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22 17:28 [PATCH] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern Neil Horman
2009-06-25 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26  1:49   ` Neil Horman
2009-06-26 10:48   ` Neil Horman
2009-06-26 16:20     ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 17:30       ` Neil Horman
2009-06-28 19:31       ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-28 20:52         ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-28 21:00           ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-28 21:18             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-28 21:50               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-28 21:35           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-28 21:48             ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-28 22:06               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-29  9:15                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-28 21:52             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 18:00   ` Neil Horman
2009-06-26 18:02   ` [PATCH 1/2] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern: recursive dump detection Neil Horman
2009-06-26 16:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 20:24       ` Neil Horman
2009-06-26 19:14         ` [PATCH 0/2] do_coredump: misc cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 19:14           ` [PATCH 1/2] do_coredump: factor out put_cred() calls Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 22:40             ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-26 20:33               ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 19:16           ` [PATCH 2/2] do_coredump: move !ispipe code into "else" branch Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 20:18             ` Q: do_coredump() && d_unhashed() Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 22:57           ` [PATCH 0/2] do_coredump: misc cleanups Neil Horman
2009-06-26 19:37     ` [PATCH 1/2] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern: recursive dump detection Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 20:17       ` Neil Horman
2009-06-26 18:03   ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern: wait for core collectors Neil Horman
2009-06-26 16:48     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-26 20:20       ` Neil Horman
2009-06-29  0:33   ` Neil Horman [this message]
2009-06-29  0:35   ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v3) Neil Horman
2009-06-28 22:24     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-28 23:24       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-29  2:36       ` Neil Horman
2009-06-28 23:32         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-29 10:21           ` Neil Horman
2009-06-30  0:06             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-29  0:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Neil Horman
2009-06-30 17:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v4) Neil Horman
2009-06-30 17:42   ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v4) Neil Horman
2009-06-30 17:43   ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v4) Neil Horman
2009-06-30 17:46   ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v4) Neil Horman
2009-07-01  5:52     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 10:31       ` Neil Horman
2009-07-01 12:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 14:12           ` Neil Horman
2009-07-01 14:48             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v5) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 15:30   ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v5) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 15:34   ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v5) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 15:37   ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v5) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 16:06     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 18:19       ` Neil Horman
2009-07-01 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v6) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 18:31   ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v6) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 18:32   ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v6) Neil Horman
2009-07-01 18:37   ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v6) Neil Horman
2009-07-02  8:29     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-02 10:29       ` Neil Horman
2009-07-02 11:36         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-02 14:44           ` Neil Horman
2009-07-02 15:37             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-02 17:53               ` Neil Horman
2009-07-03 10:10                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v7) Neil Horman
2009-07-02 22:59   ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v7) Neil Horman
2009-07-02 23:00   ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v7) Neil Horman
2009-07-02 23:01   ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v7) Neil Horman
2009-07-03 10:16     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-03 10:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v8) Neil Horman
2009-07-03 10:50   ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v8) Neil Horman
2009-07-07 16:14     ` Neil Horman
2009-07-03 10:51   ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v8) Neil Horman
2009-07-07 16:15     ` Neil Horman
2009-07-03 10:52   ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v8) Neil Horman
2009-07-07 16:19     ` Neil Horman
2009-07-07 16:35       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-07 16:13   ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v8) Neil Horman
2009-07-20 15:49   ` [PATCH 0/3] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern (v9) Neil Horman
2009-07-20 16:27     ` [PATCH 1/3] exec: Make do_coredump more resilient to recursive crashes (v9) Neil Horman
2009-07-20 16:29     ` [PATCH 2/3] exec: let do_coredump limit the number of concurrent dumps to pipes (v9) Neil Horman
2009-08-07 17:08       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-20 16:32     ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: Allow do_coredump to wait for user space pipe readers to complete (v9) Neil Horman
2009-07-29 15:13 ` [PATCH] exec: Make do_coredump more robust and safer when using pipes in core_pattern Scott James Remnant
2009-07-29 20:18   ` Neil Horman
2009-07-31 20:20     ` Scott James Remnant
2009-08-01 13:41       ` Neil Horman
2009-08-01 18:28         ` Scott James Remnant
2009-08-02  0:22           ` Neil Horman
2009-08-02 13:49             ` Scott James Remnant
2009-08-02 23:50               ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090629003328.GB2479@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=earl_chew@agilent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox