From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 -tip] perf_counter tools: Add support to set of multiple events in one shot
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:57:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629035708.GD8059@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246202166.2982.8.camel@hpdv5.satnam>
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 15:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 18:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Add support for HARDWARE and SOFTWARE events :
> > > > > perf stat -e all-sw-events
> > > > > perf stat -e sw-events
> > > > > perf stat -e all-hw-events
> > > > > perf stat -e hw-events
> > > >
> > > > > +static struct event_type_symbol event_type_symbols[] = {
> > > > > + [PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE] = { "hw-events", "all-hw-events", },
> > > > > + [PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE] = { "sw-events", "all-sw-events", },
> > > >
> > > > Hm, this really just special-cases and open-codes these. The better
> > > > solution is what i suggested in my review of your prior patches:
> > > > regex pattern matching.
> > > >
> > >
> > > parse_events() is responsible to parse events for 'perf stat -e'
> > > and it is parsing by parse_event_symbol()
> > >
> > > If you want to use regex pattern matching then either we should
> > > make some another option or if we need to rewrite
> > > parse_event_symbol to use regex pattern matching which will be
> > > applicable to all the events.
> >
> > As i mentioned it before, i think the most intuitive solution is to
> > extend the --event syntax with regex patterns. No new option - just
> > richer -e syntax.
> >
> > We could have this syntax:
> >
> > hw-cpu-cycles
> > hw-instructions
> > hw-cache-references
> > hw-cache-misses
> > hw-branch-instructions
> > hw-branch-misses
> > hw-bus-cycles
> >
> > sw-cpu-clock
> > sw-task-clock
> > sw-page-faults
> > sw-minor-faults
> > sw-major-faults
> > sw-context-switches
> > sw-cpu-migrations
> >
> > regex patterns like:
> >
> > hw-*
> > sw-*
> > *
> >
> > the first one would select all hardware events - the second all
> > software events - the third all events in general. But other regex
> > patterns make sense too, like:
> >
> > *branch*
> > *cache*
> > *fault*
> >
> > And as the number of generic events increases, so will regex
> > patterns become more and more useful.
> >
>
> This is a good approach, but this should be done separately
> because these will effect all the events.
>
> Currently I send patches to support multiple events in one shot
> which is adding new feature.
>
> And you telling to use regex wildcard for all the events in
> parse_event_symbol() which is enhancement and should be done in
> series of patches.
The above patterns i suggested _already cover_ 'multiple events'.
We might define further aliases like:
all := "*"
all-sw := "sw-*"
but it should all be in terms of patterns and regular expressions,
not via some hardcoded special-case thing as your posted patches
did.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-26 21:30 [GIT PULL -tip][PATCH 0/3 -tip] perf stat patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/3 -tip] perf stat: fix stat output Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-26 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/3 -tip] perf_counter tools: Add support to set of multiple events in one shot Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-26 21:35 ` [PATCH 3/3 -tip] perf_counter tools: Add support for all CACHE events Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-27 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/3 -tip] perf_counter tools: Add support to set of multiple events in one shot Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 19:04 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-28 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-28 15:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-29 3:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-30 8:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 13:22 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 22:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 17:31 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf stat: Improve output tip-bot for Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-29 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-29 19:52 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629035708.GD8059@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox