From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] Use IPI_shortcut for lapic timer broadcast
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:16:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629081615.GB571@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3877989d0906290104q11a767b6qcc1acc4c2d1feba6@mail.gmail.com>
* Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We need to use IPI shortcut to send lapic timer broadcast
> >> to avoid the latency of sending IPI one bye one on systems with many
> >> logical processors when NO_HZ is disabled.
> >> Without this patch,I have seen upstream kernel with RHEL 5 kernel
> >> config boot hang .
> >
> > hm, that might be a valid optimization - but why does the lack of
> > this optimization result in a hang?
>
> It is hang caused by kernel code for work around lapic-timer-stop
> issue. With HZ=1000, and a lot of cpus (eg. 64 logical cpus), cpu
> 0 will be busy working on send TIMER IPI instead of making
> progress in boot (right after deep-C-state has been used).
that's a bit weird. With HZ=1000 we have 1000 usecs between each
timer tick. Assuming a CPU sends to a lot of CPUs (64 logical CPUs)
that means that each IPI takes more than ~15 microseconds to
process. On what hardware/platform can this happen realistically?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 6:47 [RFC patch] Use IPI_shortcut for lapic timer broadcast Luming Yu
2009-06-29 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 8:04 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-29 8:21 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 8:43 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-29 20:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-30 7:01 ` Luming Yu
2009-07-03 0:23 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-03 2:04 ` Luming Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629081615.GB571@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luming.yu@gmail.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox