public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	markmc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kvm: remove in_range and switch to rwsem for iobus
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:23:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629092309.GA19167@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A487D2C.2020007@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:37:00AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/28/2009 10:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> This changes bus accesses to use high-level kvm_io_bus_read/kvm_io_bus_write
>> functions, which utilize read/write semaphore intead of mutex.  in_range now
>> becomes unused so it is removed from device ops in favor of read/write
>> callbacks performing range checks internally.
>>
>> This allows aliasing (mostly for in-kernel virtio), as well as better error
>> handling by making it possible to pass errors up to userspace. And it's enough
>> to look at the diffstat to see that it's a better API anyway.
>>
>> While we are at it, document locking rules for kvm_io_device_ops.
>>
>> Note: since the use of the new bus_lock is localized to a small number of
>> places, it will be easy to switch to srcu in the future if we so desire.
>>    
>
> Looks good. But please split into a locking change patch and an API  
> change patch (in whatever order makes more sense).
> 
> I think you can reuse slots_lock instead of adding a new lock. IIRC  
> slots_lock is already taken for read everywhere, so you only need to  
> take it for write when registering things.

IMO this will make it harder to convert to rcu down the line.
As it is we just grep for bus_lock and replace with rcu.
While possibly slots_lock can be converted to rcu as well,
let's do it one thing at a time.
What do you think?

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-29  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-28 19:34 [PATCHv2] kvm: remove in_range and switch to rwsem for iobus Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29  8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29  9:23   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-06-29  9:44     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29  9:51       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29  9:57         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29  9:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29  9:53     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29 10:06       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 10:21         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29 14:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-29 14:28   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090629092309.GA19167@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox