From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] asm-generic:remove calling flush_write_buffers() in dma_sync_*_for_cpu
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629154406.GQ5139@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d82e647a0906290754t13bc1b37s6ea6fd582a7fdbe@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:54:51PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>:
> >>
> >> IMHO, even we do not call flush_write_buffer(), CPU can read correct
> >> data from the
> >> dma buffer since write buffer can't affect cache, right?
> >
> > flush_write_buffer is not about cache flushing. It is about read/write
> > reordering in the CPU. Think of it as a memory barrier. On most x86
>
> You mean we may need a memory barrier between writing data from bouncing buffer
> to dma buffer and reading data from dma buffer, do you?
CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE (when set flush_write_buffers is a memory barrier and not a
nop on x86) is defined for WINCHIP. So it seems necessary on some chips.
Joerg
--
| Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Operating | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach bei München
System |
Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
| Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-28 14:39 [PATCH][RFC] asm-generic:remove calling flush_write_buffers() in dma_sync_*_for_cpu tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-29 12:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-29 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2009-06-29 14:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-29 14:54 ` Ming Lei
2009-06-29 15:44 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2009-06-29 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-29 16:31 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-29 16:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-29 17:16 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-30 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-30 12:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-30 12:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-30 13:09 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-30 13:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-07 1:54 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-07 7:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-07-07 13:43 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-07 14:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-07 14:55 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-07 15:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-07 17:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-07-07 17:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-06-29 18:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-29 19:10 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-29 19:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-29 18:48 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629154406.GQ5139@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox