From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
markmc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] kvm: convert bus to slots_lock
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:04:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090629170418.GA17937@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090629163851.GD22029@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:38:51PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:50:31PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > index 148c52a..1851aec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > @@ -548,6 +548,6 @@ struct kvm_pic *kvm_create_pic(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > * Initialize PIO device
> > > */
> > > kvm_iodevice_init(&s->dev, &picdev_ops);
> > > - kvm_io_bus_register_dev(&kvm->pio_bus, &s->dev);
> > > + kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, &kvm->pio_bus, &s->dev);
> > > return s;
> >
> > case KVM_CREATE_PIT2:
> > create_pit:
> > mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > kvm_io_bus_register_dev
> > down_write(slots_lock);
> >
> > But the order is slots_lock -> kvm->lock.
> >
> > (you might want to update the comment on top of kvm_main.c to
> > reflect that).
>
> Good catch. I think it's easiest to replace kvm->lock by slots_lock
> here as well. Does something like the following make sense?
> If yes I'll roll it up in the series.
Looks good. Also please update the comment on top of kvm_main.c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1246276816.git.mst@redhat.com>
2009-06-29 12:08 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] kvm: document locking for kvm_io_device_ops Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 12:09 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] kvm: switch coalesced mmio changes to slots_lock Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 12:09 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] kvm: convert bus " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 15:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-29 16:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 17:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-06-29 12:09 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] kvm: remove in_range from io devices Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-29 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090629170418.GA17937@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox