Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: adding memory barrier to the poll and receive callbacks

Davide Libenzi
2009-06-29T20:22:00Z

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Jiri Olsa wrote:

> my thinking was that both variants will endup in the same code anyway,
> so it'd be probably better if the more readable (subjective) got in..
>
> however I dont have any strong preffering feelings about either of those choices,
> so I can convert easilly :)

Please use the existing poll_wait() then, as there's no reason to add
another API.

- Davide