From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755931AbZF3J0c (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:26:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751628AbZF3J0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:26:23 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56248 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751309AbZF3J0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:26:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:26:23 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Suresh Siddha , Sheng Yang , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "avi@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM Message-ID: <20090630092623.GI20289@redhat.com> References: <20090629132926.GB20289@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Gleb Natapov writes: > > > KVM would like to provide x2APIC interface to a guest without emulating > > interrupt remapping device. The reason KVM prefers guest to use x2APIC > > is that x2APIC interface is better virtualizable and provides better > > performance than mmio xAPIC interface: > > > > - msr exits are faster than mmio (no page table walk, emulation) > > - no need to read back ICR to look at the busy bit > > - one 64 bit ICR write instead of two 32 bit writes > > - shared code with the Hyper-V paravirt interface > > > > Included patch changes x2APIC enabling logic to enable it even if IR > > initialization failed, but kernel runs under KVM and no apic id is > > greater than 255 (if there is one spec requires BIOS to move to x2apic > > mode before starting an OS). > > > How common is hotplug hardware in kvm? In particular hotplug cpus? > It works for Linux guests. > To support that seriously you need interrupt remapping. > Can you explain why? -- Gleb.