public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
	snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:28:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090701012827.GA13958@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A49B364.5000508@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:40:36PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> ...
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Do the accounting. Determine how much service (in terms of time slices)
> > + * current queue used and adjust the start, finish time of queue and vtime
> > + * of the tree accordingly.
> > + *
> > + * Determining the service used in terms of time is tricky in certain
> > + * situations. Especially when underlying device supports command queuing
> > + * and requests from multiple queues can be there at same time, then it
> > + * is not clear which queue consumed how much of disk time.
> > + *
> > + * To mitigate this problem, cfq starts the time slice of the queue only
> > + * after first request from the queue has completed. This does not work
> > + * very well if we expire the queue before we wait for first and more
> > + * request to finish from the queue. For seeky queues, we will expire the
> > + * queue after dispatching few requests without waiting and start dispatching
> > + * from next queue.
> > + *
> > + * Not sure how to determine the time consumed by queue in such scenarios.
> > + * Currently as a crude approximation, we are charging 25% of time slice
> > + * for such cases. A better mechanism is needed for accurate accounting.
> > + */
> 
>   Hi Vivek,
> 
>   The comment is out of date, would you update it accordingly?
> 

Thanks Gui. Yes, I will update it in next posting.

Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-19 20:37 [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 01/20] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  8:46   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 12:43     ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  2:43       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  4:10         ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  7:32           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-23 13:42             ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  2:05     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  2:20       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-30  6:40   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01  1:28     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-07-01  9:24   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 03/20] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 04/20] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 05/20] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-29  5:27   ` [PATCH] io-controller: optimization for iog deletion when elevator exiting Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-29 14:06     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 17:14       ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-01  1:34         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 12:10   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:38     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30  7:49   ` [PATCH] io-controller: Don't expire an idle ioq if it's the only ioq in hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01  1:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01  1:40       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  1:45   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 15:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 21:52   ` Paul Menage
2009-06-25 10:23     ` [PATCH] io-controller: do some changes of io.policy interface Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-25 12:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-26  0:27         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  0:59         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 19/20] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  7:44   ` [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 17:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  6:44       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:02         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24  9:20           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  8:13             ` [PATCH 1/2] io-controller: Prepare a rt ioq list in efqd to keep track of busy rt ioqs Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  8:13             ` [PATCH 2/2] io-controller: make rt preemption happen in the whole hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 12:39               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-21 15:21 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 15:30   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 15:40     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 16:02       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 16:06         ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 17:08           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  6:52             ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-29 16:04 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-06-29 17:23   ` Vivek Goyal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-26 22:41 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V3 Vivek Goyal
2009-05-26 22:41 ` [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-05-27 20:53   ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-28  8:52     ` Fabio Checconi
2009-05-28 16:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-28 19:41       ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-29 16:06         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-29 16:57           ` Fabio Checconi
2009-05-29 19:06             ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-29 19:16               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-08  1:08   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-08 12:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-08  7:44   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-08 13:56     ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090701012827.GA13958@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox