From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
serue@us.ibm.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Disable CLONE_PARENT for init
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:01:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090701080106.GA14762@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090701074654.A6C6321D57@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Roland McGrath [roland@redhat.com] wrote:
| > When global or container-init processes use CLONE_PARENT, they create a
| > multi-rooted process tree.
|
| I take this to be the real motivation for your change.
| But you don't mention it in the code comment.
Well, it was - when I started. But my understanding of the comments was that
the constraint could be extended to global init as well for the following
reason.
|
| > + * Swapper process sets the handler for SIGCHLD to SIG_DFL. If init
| > + * creates a sibling and the sibling exits, the SIGCHLD is sent to
| > + * the swapper (since the swapper's handler for SIGCHLD is SIG_DFL).
| > + * But since the swapper does not reap its children, the zombie will
| > + * remain forever. So prevent init from using CLONE_PARENT.
|
| This would be fixed by having swapper set its SIGCHLD to SIG_IGN instead,
| so such children self-reap. That seems like the better fix for that.
Yes, that would fix the global init case.
|
| If you want to make this change because of container-init issues, I think
| you should just say so independent of this global-init case.
So can I leave the check for SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE but simplify the comments
to refer to the multi-rooted process tree ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 7:31 [RFC][PATCH] Disable CLONE_PARENT for init Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-07-01 7:46 ` Roland McGrath
2009-07-01 8:01 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2009-07-01 8:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 21:48 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-07-01 21:58 ` Roland McGrath
2009-07-02 0:35 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-07-02 0:49 ` Roland McGrath
2009-07-02 7:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-02 12:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-01 23:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090701080106.GA14762@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox