public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	vapier.adi@gmail.com, lethal@linux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] kernel/printk.c - handling more than one CON_BOOT
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:14:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090701211411.GD631@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090701140128.7924f3c4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > > I think it would be useful if we had a description of the new 
> > > design, similar to your description of the "Today" behaviour 
> > > above.  Perhaps as a comment over register_console()?
> > 
> > Can do - do you want it as v3 or on-top of this one?
> 
> I'm easy either way.  Ingo might have applied to one of his trees, 
> in which case a replacement patch might cause him problems, dunno.

Not yet - i was waiting for feedback from you and Linus. Would be 
nice to have a from-scratch v3 that adresses all the review 
feedback.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-29 11:03 RFC - printk handling more than one CON_BOOT Robin Getz
2009-06-30 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:05   ` Robin Getz
2009-06-30 23:14     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01  0:29       ` Robin Getz
2009-07-01  2:51 ` [RFC v2] kernel/printk.c - " Robin Getz
2009-07-01 19:44   ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-01 20:50     ` Robin Getz
2009-07-01 21:01       ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-01 21:14         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-07-01 21:28         ` Robin Getz
2009-07-01 21:31         ` Robin Getz
2009-07-02  1:08 ` [PATCH] - printk " Robin Getz
2009-07-03  8:58   ` [tip:core/printk] printk: Enable the use of more than one CON_BOOT (early console) tip-bot for Robin Getz
2009-07-21 18:37   ` [PATCH] - printk handling more than one CON_BOOT Robin Getz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090701211411.GD631@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox