From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755675AbZGBSOm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:14:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752893AbZGBSOd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:14:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:36364 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbZGBSOd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:14:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:11:43 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar , Ratan Nalumasu , Roland McGrath , Vitaly Mayatskikh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/1] do not place sub-threads on task_struct->children list Message-ID: <20090702181143.GA28577@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While this change is rather simple, it is of course dangerous. Because it is not possible to grep for children/sibling usage. So it needs testing. OTOH, this change is obviously good optimization. The patch does not depend on other changes. Oleg.