From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Styner,
Douglas W" <douglas.w.styner@intel.com>,
Chinang Ma <chinang.ma@intel.com>,
"Prickett, Terry O" <terry.o.prickett@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
Eric.Moore@lsi.com, DL-MPTFusionLinux@lsi.com
Subject: Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 21:54:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090703195458.GK2041@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090703194557.GQ5480@parisc-linux.org>
> That would seem to be a fruitful avenue of
> investigation -- whether limiting the cards to a single RX/TX interrupt
> would be advantageous, or whether spreading the eight interrupts out
> over the CPUs would be advantageous.
The kernel should really do the per cpu binding of MSIs by default.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-03 2:56 >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18 Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-03 17:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-03 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-03 18:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-03 19:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-03 19:22 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-03 19:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-03 19:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-07-03 20:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-03 23:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-04 6:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-04 8:44 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-04 9:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-05 4:01 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-05 13:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-05 16:11 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-06 8:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-05 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-06 1:19 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-06 8:45 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-06 17:00 ` Rick Jones
2009-07-06 17:36 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-07-06 17:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-06 17:57 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-07-06 18:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-06 18:48 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-07-06 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-06 21:16 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-07-07 8:16 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-05 11:00 Daniel J Blueman
2009-07-06 21:58 ` Chetan.Loke
2009-07-07 22:05 ` Daniel J Blueman
2009-07-08 15:03 ` Chetan.Loke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090703195458.GK2041@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=DL-MPTFusionLinux@lsi.com \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
--cc=chinang.ma@intel.com \
--cc=douglas.w.styner@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=terry.o.prickett@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox