From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: michal.simek@petalogix.com
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LTP <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: mmap syscall problem
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907061705.50308.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A520DA6.2040107@petalogix.com>
On Monday 06 July 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
> > *p1 = 0xaa; *p2 = 0x55;
> >
> I closed fd too.
> close(fd);
> > return *p1; /* returns 0xaa if broken, 0x55 if correct */
> > }
If you close the fd between the assignment and reading
from the pointer again, the test case becomes invalid because of
timing. Closing the fd before the '*p1 = 0xaa' should be fine,
but unnecessary.
I also realized that you might need to mark the pointers
as 'volatile' so that the compiler has to do the operations
in order.
> >
> # ls -la existing-4k-file
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 monstr monstr 4096 Jul 6 2009 existing-4k-file
>
> # ./test-arnd
> # echo $?
> 85
Ok, so inside a single task, this does not happen.
> # dd if=existing-4k-file of=/dev/console count=1 2>/dev/null
> U#
>
> in file is first char U (0x55) which is IMO correct.
Right, though that was not part of the test, I'd expect this in
the file even if the return value was broken.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-06 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-03 12:37 mmap syscall problem Michal Simek
2009-07-03 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-06 6:32 ` Michal Simek
2009-07-06 8:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-06 12:07 ` Michal Simek
2009-07-06 12:14 ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-06 12:54 ` Michal Simek
2009-07-06 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-06 14:43 ` Michal Simek
2009-07-06 15:05 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-07-06 15:19 ` Michal Simek
2009-07-07 0:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907061705.50308.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox