public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:51:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090707015115.GB5310@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907061318.20839.trenn@suse.de>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:

 > So if not find too intrusive, I'd say:
 > Venkatesh's whole series of:
 > [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
 > should be seen in .31.
 >  ...
 > The one patch from Mathieu:
 > [patch 2.6.30 2/4] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess
 > is a separate, general cleanup which should show up in .31.

I came to the same conclusion after reading the thread, and looking
over the patches.  I merged the above, and sent Linus a pull request
a few minutes ago.

Thanks Mathieu and Venki for chasing this down.

	Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-07  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-06 11:18 cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31 Thomas Renninger
2009-07-06 13:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-06 17:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-07  1:51 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2009-07-27 14:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-27 16:31     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-27 16:37       ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090707015115.GB5310@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox