Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18

Andi Kleen
2009-07-04T08:44:38Z

> for networking, especially for incoming data such as new connections,
> that isn't the case.. that's more or less randomly (well hash based)
> distributed.

Ok. Still binding them all to a single CPU all is quite dumb. It
makes MSI-X quite useless and probably even harmful.

We don't default to socket power saving for normal scheduling either,
but only when you specify a special knob. I don't see why interrupts
should be different.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.