From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:56:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708145625.GA20690@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A54A938.5030807@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:55:04AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> >> On 07/08/2009 09:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> >>> On 07/08/2009 06:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm not quite sure if something in the F11 initrd needs usbfs for
> >>>> something (cc'ed Peter)
> >>> Not a thing.
> >> Actually, I take it back. We do mount usbfs, and we examine
> >> /proc/bus/usb/devices as a heuristic to try and determine if
> >> all the devices have been enumerated.
> >
> > How can you ever know if all devices are enumerated as you don't know
> > how many devices will be showing up?
>
> You don't, that's why I said it's a heuristic. But basically, we have a
> timeout, and if the device list doesn't change in that amount of time, we
> call it done.
>
> It's not the best technique ever, but it does work.
Works for what? Why would you want to delay your boot process like
this?
> >> So that could be related to what you're seeing.
> >
> > That file is now available in /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices if you
> > really need it.
>
> Oh, okay. I can change it to use that then.
>
> > But I would think that you do not.
>
> Well, we pretty much do until we switch to dracut.
What is dracut and why would it change this?
As no other distro does this kind of waiting, I'm a bit confused as to
the need for it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 5:11 can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded? Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 8:17 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-06-23 14:42 ` Greg KH
2009-06-23 15:29 ` Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 15:39 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 10:54 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:03 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-08 11:20 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:42 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-07-08 13:00 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 13:52 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 13:55 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:04 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 14:12 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-07-08 15:05 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 15:47 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 21:23 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-09 0:43 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 1:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09 2:31 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 3:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09 12:12 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 1:33 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:12 ` Bill Nottingham
2009-07-08 15:44 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090708145625.GA20690@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=scott@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).