From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758117AbZGHSLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:11:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753841AbZGHSLF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:11:05 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:55522 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753428AbZGHSLE (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:11:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:10:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Rusty Russell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: don't bounce highmem requests Message-ID: <20090708181053.GA10552@lst.de> References: <20090619182022.GA10999@lst.de> <20090620183215.GA24936@lst.de> <200906231642.52848.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906231642.52848.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:42:52PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:02:15 am Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks like I sent a patch that doesn't actually compile because qui > > decided to apply those fixes to a different one. Here's the correc > > one: > > > > -- > > > > Subject: virtio_blk: don't bounce highmem requests > > From: Christoph Hellwig > > > > By default a block driver bounces highmem requests, but virtio-blk is > > perfectly fine with any request that fit into it's 64 bit addressing > > scheme, mapped in the kernel virtual space or not. > > Thanks, applied. Can you forward it to Linus for 2.6.31? It's a trivial fix for an issue causing a lot of pain to people with highmem enabled.