From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Make cond_resched*() available earlier
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:45:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708204545.GA3216@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247057926.9777.54.camel@twins>
Using early netconsole and gianfar driver this error pops up:
netconsole: timeout waiting for carrier
It appears that net/core/netpoll.c:netpoll_setup() is using
cond_resched() in a loop waiting for a carrier.
The thing is that cond_resched() is a no-op when system_state !=
SYSTEM_RUNNING, and so drivers/net/phy/phy.c's state_queue is never
scheduled, therefore link detection doesn't work.
The system_state check exists to avoid very early calls to the
scheduler. Though, using cond_resched() should be safe after scheduler
is initialized, so instead of checking the system_state, we can test
that the scheduler is running, therefore making cond_resched() and
friends available much earlier (but not too much).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
---
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:58:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
> > > > Hm. Speaking of cond_resched*() only, then it should be pretty
> > > > safe to convert the SYSTEM_RUNNING checks to scheduler_running,
> > > > no? scheduler_running is set after sched_init().
> > >
> > > Hmm, that might work, I'd have to audit sched_init_smp() as it seems to
> > > do way too much...
> >
> > sched_init_smp() is called from the kernel_thread(), so
> > if the scheduler is not functional prior to kernel_thread(),
> > you're in trouble anyway, no? The point is that a lot of
> > code is calling schedule() prior to sched_init_smp()
> > (e.g. msleep(), mutexes), and there are no issues. So
> > should be no issues with cond_resched()?
>
> Yeah, it should be good, I just got paranoid looking at
> sched_init_smp().
OK, thanks everyone for the reviews.
Here is an updated patch. As usual, tested on UP PowerPC, with and
without SMP, PREEMPT and PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.
kernel/sched.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 7c9098d..555360b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6561,7 +6561,7 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
int __sched _cond_resched(void)
{
if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
- system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
+ scheduler_running) {
__cond_resched();
return 1;
}
@@ -6579,7 +6579,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
*/
int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
- int resched = need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
+ int resched = need_resched() && scheduler_running;
int ret = 0;
if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
@@ -6599,7 +6599,7 @@ int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
{
BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
- if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
+ if (need_resched() && scheduler_running) {
local_bh_enable();
__cond_resched();
local_bh_disable();
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 23:58 [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 0:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-08 6:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:03 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:55 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 20:45 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-07-08 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-08 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 21:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 22:20 ` [PATCH] netpoll: Fix carrier detection for drivers that are using phylib Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-09 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09 3:08 ` David Miller
2009-07-09 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 12:56 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:26 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:18 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:43 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 15:06 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09 12:52 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 23:20 ` [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090708204545.GA3216@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox