public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: fix sparse warning
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:29:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090709062906.GA14804@feather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0907081228p541d1cdao85f37aaa479fcfc5@mail.gmail.com>

[Adding Linus and Chris Li to CC; Linus for further background on
-Wdo-while, and Chris Li for Sparse.]

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:28:24PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 2009/7/6 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>:
> > Whether or not the sparse warning
> >
> > warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
> >
> > is justified or not in this case, it is annoying and
> > trivial to fix.
[...]
> 
> I'll change the patch title to "kmemcheck: work around bogus sparse
> warning" and fix the indentation, sounds ok?
> 
> Meanwhile, I Cced sparse mailing list in case somebody else knows
> anything else about this warning (what it means, whether it's
> justified in this case, whether it should be fixed in sparse, etc.).

-Wdo-while gives a warning if you write:

do
    statement
while (...);

where "statement" does not consist of a compound statement surrounded by
braces.  As far as I know, this warning exists primarily because it
matched Linus's preference for readability.

However, note that Sparse does not have -Wdo-while enabled by default.
Sparse only issues that warning if you use -Wdo-while explicitly, or if
you pass -Wall.  (The latter often happens due to passing the same
warning flags to GCC and Sparse, without using cgcc which filters out
-Wall for Sparse for that reason.)

Much discussion has occurred previously suggesting that Sparse's -Wall
should match GCC's "all useful warnings" rather than "all possible
warnings", and some other option should exist for "all possible
warnings" (for instance, -Weverything).  This seems very reasonable.
Given that Sparse *exists* to give warnings, -Wall's "all useful
warnings" approach seems like it matches Sparse's default behavior;
thus, I think it would make the most sense to make Sparse just interpret
-Wall as "enable all the warnings enabled by default" (which would
normally act as a no-op, but would make a difference if you passed
"-Wno-foo -Wall" for some default warning foo).

This would improve Sparse's behavior for the case where you invoke
sparse $(CFLAGS) directly rather than setting CC=cgcc, if CFLAGS
contains -Wall.

- Josh Triplett

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-06  9:53 [PATCH] kmemcheck: fix sparse warning Johannes Berg
2009-07-06 17:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-08 19:28 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-07-08 19:39   ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-08 20:28     ` Christopher Li
2009-07-09  6:29   ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2009-07-09  7:00     ` Hannes Eder
2009-07-29 13:42 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-01 15:17   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-06 12:36   ` Raja R Harinath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090709062906.GA14804@feather \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox