* [PATCH] cpufreq: unbreak build for !CONFIG_SMP
@ 2009-07-08 19:24 Daniel Mack
2009-07-09 8:43 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP Thomas Renninger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2009-07-08 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Daniel Mack, Mathieu Desnoyers, Venkatesh Pallipadi, rjw, mingo,
Shaohua Li, Pekka Enberg, Dave Young, Rusty Russell, sven.wegener,
cpufreq, Thomas Renninger, Dave Jones
'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP for its declaration in order to make cpufreq.c
build on systems with CONFIG_SMP=n.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: sven.wegener@stealer.net
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index c668ac8..d160867 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -776,9 +776,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
struct sys_device *cpu_sys_dev;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int j;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct cpufreq_policy *managed_policy;
-#endif
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
return 0;
--
1.6.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP
2009-07-08 19:24 [PATCH] cpufreq: unbreak build for !CONFIG_SMP Daniel Mack
@ 2009-07-09 8:43 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-07-09 8:48 ` Daniel Mack
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2009-07-09 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Mack
Cc: linux-kernel, Mathieu Desnoyers, Venkatesh Pallipadi, rjw, mingo,
Shaohua Li, Pekka Enberg, Dave Young, Rusty Russell, sven.wegener,
cpufreq, Dave Jones
Or like that:
Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
approach.
---
'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
done at other places.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* symlink affected CPUs */
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
if (j == cpu)
@@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
goto err_out_unregister;
}
}
+#endif
policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
* run in cpufreq_set_policy */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP
2009-07-09 8:43 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP Thomas Renninger
@ 2009-07-09 8:48 ` Daniel Mack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2009-07-09 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Renninger
Cc: linux-kernel, Mathieu Desnoyers, Venkatesh Pallipadi, rjw, mingo,
Shaohua Li, Pekka Enberg, Dave Young, Rusty Russell, sven.wegener,
cpufreq, Dave Jones
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:43:35AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Or like that:
> Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
> should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
> approach.
Dave Jones fixed it already, see
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8
Daniel
> ---
> 'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
>
> Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
> done at other places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
>
> Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* symlink affected CPUs */
> for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
> if (j == cpu)
> @@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
> goto err_out_unregister;
> }
> }
> +#endif
>
> policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
> * run in cpufreq_set_policy */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-09 8:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-08 19:24 [PATCH] cpufreq: unbreak build for !CONFIG_SMP Daniel Mack
2009-07-09 8:43 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP Thomas Renninger
2009-07-09 8:48 ` Daniel Mack
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox