public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: get rid of the need for __GFP_FAIL in cfq_find_alloc_queue()
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:38:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090709173823.GN23611@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090709154446.GD30832@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 09 2009, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:26:17PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26 2009, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Setup an emergency fallback cfqq that we allocate at IO scheduler init
> > > > time. If the slab allocation fails in cfq_find_alloc_queue(), we'll just
> > > > punt IO to that cfqq instead. This ensures that cfq_find_alloc_queue()
> > > > never fails without having to ensure free memory.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  block/cfq-iosched.c |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > > >  1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > index c760ae7..91e7e0b 100644
> > > > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Fallback dummy cfqq for extreme OOM conditions
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	struct cfq_queue oom_cfqq;
> > > 
> > > OK, so you're embedding a cfqq into the cfqd.  That's 136 bytes, so I
> > > guess that's not too bad.
> > > 
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Our fallback cfqq if cfq_find_alloc_queue() runs into OOM issues.
> > > > +	 * Grab a permanent reference to it, so that the normal code flow
> > > > +	 * will not attempt to free it.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	cfq_init_cfqq(cfqd, &cfqd->oom_cfqq, 1, 0);
> > > > +	atomic_inc(&cfqd->oom_cfqq.ref);
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I guess this is so we never try to free it, good.  ;)
> > > 
> > > One issue I have with this patch is that, if a task happens to run into
> > > this condition, there is no way out.  It will always have the oom_cfqq
> > > as it's cfqq.  Can't we fix that if we recover from the OOM condition?
> > 
> > Yeah, I fixed that about an hour after posting the patches. See:
> > 
> > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=0370bc158cb1d5faa4b8a38c0de3211f0fd5bd64
> > 
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> I think above patch might not fix the issue of an oom_cfqq getting stuck
> with an io context. The reason being that once we allocate the cfqq, it
> will be cached in cic and once next request comes, we will retrieve it
> from cic and never call cfq_get_queue()/cfq_find_alloc_queue().
> 
> I think we probably need to do cfqq == oom_cfqq check in cfq_set_request()
> also.

Yes good catch, this is needed too!  Can you please send as a "real"
patch with signed-off-by added? Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-26  9:05 [PATCH 0/2] cfq-iosched: get rid of __GFP_NOFAIL Jens Axboe
2009-06-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] cfq-iosched: move cfqq initialization out of cfq_find_alloc_queue() Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 16:09   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: get rid of the need for __GFP_FAIL in cfq_find_alloc_queue() Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 16:25   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-27 18:26     ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-29 13:46       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-29 17:34         ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-29 17:44           ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-29 17:48             ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-09 15:44       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-09 17:38         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-07-09 19:59           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-09 20:15             ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-01  9:28   ` Shan Wei
2009-07-01  9:32     ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-02  0:49       ` Shan Wei
2009-07-02  6:33         ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 16:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] cfq-iosched: get rid of __GFP_NOFAIL Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090709173823.GN23611@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox