public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, oleg@redhat.com,
	avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:20:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090709232021.GD1469@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090708141024.f8b581c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Hi!

> > That said, I do agree that maybe SYSTEM_RUNNING isn't the right check. 
> > Testing that the scheduler is initialized may be the more correct one. I 
> > think the SYSTEM_RUNNING one just comes from that being used for other 
> > debug issues.
> 
> Agreed.  system_state is too general.
> 
> If we specifically want to know whether it is safe to call schedule() then
> let's create a global boolean it_is_safe_to_call_schedule and test that,
> rather than testing something which indirectly and unreliably implies "it
> is safe to call schedule".  If that boolean already exists then no-brainer.

or maybe we could embed that check into schedule(), just returning
when scheduler is not ready?

And I always wondered... system_state is not protected by any kind of
lock and is not atomic_t... Does it all work by mistake?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-10 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07 23:58 [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08  0:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-08  6:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:03     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:55         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:58           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 20:45             ` [PATCH] sched: Make cond_resched*() available earlier Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 16:12     ` [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-08 21:10       ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 21:33         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 21:47           ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 22:20             ` [PATCH] netpoll: Fix carrier detection for drivers that are using phylib Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-09  0:01               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09  3:08                 ` David Miller
2009-07-09  7:56                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 12:56                   ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:26                 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:46                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:18                     ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:31                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:43                         ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:51                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 15:06                             ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 17:29                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09 12:52               ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 23:20         ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090709232021.GD1469@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox