From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: -tip: block, fuse: Fix build error in fs/fuse/dev.c
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:43:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090711124326.792f3177@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090711075201.GA6517@elte.hu>
Hi Ingo,
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:52:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Today's upstream tree build (x86, 64-bit, allnoconfig+CONFIG_FUSE)
> failed with this build error:
>
> fs/fuse/dev.c: In function ‘request_end’:
> fs/fuse/dev.c:290: error: ‘BLK_RW_SYNC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> fs/fuse/dev.c:290: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> fs/fuse/dev.c:290: error: for each function it appears in.)
> fs/fuse/dev.c:291: error: ‘BLK_RW_ASYNC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Due to commit:
>
> 8aa7e84: Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion
>
> Creating a dependency of BDI callbacks on the BLK_RW_* constants,
> while those constants are only defined if CONFIG_BLOCK is enabled.
>
> Fix it the simplest way for now, by moving the definitions early
> in blkdev.h (this cannot break anything), but the real fix would
> be to split up blkdev.h into blkdev-types.h and blkdev-api.h and
> make only the API definitions/declarations dependent on
> CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 49ae079..a3cdc6d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_BLKDEV_H
> #define _LINUX_BLKDEV_H
>
> +/*
> + * Definitions used on the !CONFIG_BLOCK case too:
> + */
> +enum {
> + BLK_RW_ASYNC = 0,
> + BLK_RW_SYNC = 1,
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -70,11 +78,6 @@ enum rq_cmd_type_bits {
> REQ_TYPE_ATA_PC,
> };
>
> -enum {
> - BLK_RW_ASYNC = 0,
> - BLK_RW_SYNC = 1,
> -};
> -
> /*
> * For request of type REQ_TYPE_LINUX_BLOCK, rq->cmd[0] is the opcode being
> * sent down (similar to how REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC means that ->cmd[] holds a
I have hit this build issue as well, but with CONFIG_BLOCK=y, so the
patch above does NOT fix it. The problem I see is that fs/fuse/dev.c
does not include <linux/blkdev.h> so it doesn't get the definitions
regardless of the configuration. Same problem in fs/nfs/write.c. The
patch below fixes it for me:
* * * * *
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Fix BLK_RW_* build failures
Fix build failures caused by using BLK_RW_* constants without
including <linux/blkdev.h>.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
I have included pktcdvd and memcontrol in the patch, they don't build
for my config so I didn't see them fail, but I suspect they would, so
fix them too.
drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 1 +
fs/fuse/dev.c | 1 +
fs/nfs/write.c | 1 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.31-rc2.orig/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c 2009-07-11 12:32:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc2/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c 2009-07-11 12:33:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#include <scsi/scsi.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
--- linux-2.6.31-rc2.orig/fs/fuse/dev.c 2009-07-11 12:32:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc2/fs/fuse/dev.c 2009-07-11 12:33:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(FUSE_MINOR);
--- linux-2.6.31-rc2.orig/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-07-11 12:32:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc2/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-07-11 12:33:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/nfs_mount.h>
#include <linux/nfs_page.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
--- linux-2.6.31-rc2.orig/mm/memcontrol.c 2009-07-11 12:32:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc2/mm/memcontrol.c 2009-07-11 12:33:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-11 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-11 7:52 -tip: block, fuse: Fix build error in fs/fuse/dev.c Ingo Molnar
2009-07-11 10:43 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-07-11 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-11 11:50 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090711124326.792f3177@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox