public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: roland@redhat.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
	serue@us.ibm.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:39:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090711193944.GA32330@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090702115740.GB3552@redhat.com>

Oleg Nesterov [oleg@redhat.com] wrote:
| On 07/01, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| >
| > Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination.
| >
| > CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model.  For consistency
| > with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT and
| > CLONE_SIGHAND with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of
| > the pid namespaces are clear.
| >
| > Changelog[v2]:
| > 	[Eric Biederman] Disable CLONE_SIGHAND also ???
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
| > Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
| > ---
| >  kernel/pid_namespace.c |    2 +-
| >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
| >
| > Index: linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- linux-mmotm.orig/kernel/pid_namespace.c	2009-06-30 23:01:09.000000000 -0700
| > +++ linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c	2009-06-30 23:49:06.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsign
| >  {
| >  	if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWPID))
| >  		return get_pid_ns(old_ns);
| > -	if (flags & CLONE_THREAD)
| > +	if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_SIGHAND))
| >  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
| 
| Still can't understand why CLONE_SIGHAND is forbidden...
| 
| CLONE_SIGHAND doesn't mean we share the signal queue, so what is
| the reason?

I don't have a convincing reason. We could disable just the
CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT combination till we have a need for it. We
talked about removing CLONE_PARENT but backed-off since some application
may be using it. Disabling specific combinations like this (CLONE_NEWPID is
relatively a new flag) could make it a little easier to remove CLONE_PARENT
in the future.

Sukadev

      reply	other threads:[~2009-07-11 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-01  7:40 [RFC][PATCH] Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-07-02  1:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-07-02 11:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-11 19:39   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090711193944.GA32330@us.ibm.com \
    --to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox