From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: Add WM835x PMIC hardware monitoring driver
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:39:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090718123951.34c776ca@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090718095917.GA10160@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:59:17 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:17:12AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > > +WM8350_NAMED_VOLTAGE(0, USB);
> > > +WM8350_NAMED_VOLTAGE(1, BATT);
> > > +WM8350_NAMED_VOLTAGE(2, LINE);
>
> > I would suggest passing the whole WM8350_AUXADC_USB, etc. string as the
> > 2nd parameter. This makes grepping the source code for users (as LXR
> > does for example) possible.
>
> The reason it's formatted like that is that the AUXADC input names match
> the names of the supplies that are being monitored so the second parameter
> is also used to provide a label to userspace.
This isn't how I read the code. I see a look-up table for labels, so the
macro implementation is just a detail which shouldn't matter.
> > > +static struct platform_driver wm8350_hwmon_driver = {
> > > + .probe = wm8350_hwmon_probe,
> > > + .remove = __devexit_p(wm8350_hwmon_remove),
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "wm8350-hwmon",
>
> > I think you are supposed to set .owner to THIS_MODULE?
>
> Hrm, yeah. I need to figure out where I cut'n'pasted this from since I
> suspect the error came along with that.
Maybe from an i2c driver, where the owner is set at run-time. Back when
this was implemented, I did object that it would cause confusion
because it would make different subsystems have different
requirements... Looks like I was right.
> > When you are done, what is your merge plan? I would be happy to take
> > the patch in my unofficial hwmon tree and push it in 2.6.32, but due to
> > wm8350-core dependencies, you may prefer it to be merged differently?
>
> I'm happy to go with whatever is easiest for the people actually doing
> the merging. wm8350 is fairly static at the minute - it's much more
> likely that there would be merge issues from the build infrastructure.
> It might be a little easier to merge via mfd.
Fine with me.
> I'll fix the rest of your comments, thanks.
OK.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-18 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 20:33 [PATCH] hwmon: Add WM835x PMIC hardware monitoring driver Mark Brown
2009-07-18 9:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2009-07-18 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-18 10:39 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-07-18 10:47 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-20 11:43 Mark Brown
2009-07-20 13:19 ` Jean Delvare
2009-08-03 16:40 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090718123951.34c776ca@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox