From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090718132535.GC32618@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090714.094804.869026176829743314.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:19 +0200
>
> > X-Mew-Uidl: 4144 3205
> > Return-Path: <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Received: from murder ([unix socket])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Cyrus v2.3.8-OS X Server 10.5: 9F33) with LMTPA;
> > Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:35 +0900
> > X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
> > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418376729D2
> > for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:35 +0900 (JST)
> > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp
> > Received: from ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1])
> > by localhost (ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> > with ESMTP id 4VNvZ6jG1jE9 for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>;
> > Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:34 +0900 (JST)
> > Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu (mx3.mail.elte.hu [157.181.1.138])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08246729C2
> > for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:33 +0900 (JST)
> > Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14])
> > by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim)
> > id 1MQHFr-0003wM-HT
> > from <mingo@elte.hu>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:28 +0200
> > Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004)
> > id 115B83E22CE; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:21 +0200 (CEST)
> > Message-ID: <20090713085119.GA6757@elte.hu>
> > References: <1247230336.7529.34.camel@twins> <20090712.162337.287595819039280884.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> <1247405045.6733.2.camel@laptop> <20090713.150612.886429910823138064.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > In-Reply-To: <20090713.150612.886429910823138064.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
> > X-ELTE-SpamLevel:
> > X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
> > X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0
> > X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
> > acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:19 +0200
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
> > Received-SPF: neutral (mx3: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu;
> > X-Mew: tab/spc characters on Subject: are simplified.
> >
> >
> > * Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, steve broke it, but then Jason fixed it again, but his
> > > > patches might not have made it in yet.
> > > >
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/6/313
> > >
> > > Wow! I can obtain lock_acquire with Jason's patch,
> > >
> > > % perf stat -e lockdep:lock_acquire sleep 1
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
> > >
> > > 1420 lockdep:lock_acquire
> > >
> > > 1.004953591 seconds time elapsed
> > >
> > > I wanted this.
> > > So I don't have nothing to do.., but thanks Jason!
> >
> > I gave some review feedback about those patches, see:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/13/360
> >
> > Once they are addressed we can try them in -tip.
>
> Thanks! I'll try new features of perfcounters. It's interesting.
> But I told "not found" by lkml.org.
>
> Is the post you attempted to point
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/13/36 ?
yeah. The first post should be:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/6/313
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-18 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 6:21 [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 8:21 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 13:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-01 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 14:17 ` mitake
2009-07-01 7:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 8:42 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 9:42 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 12:53 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-06 5:20 ` mitake
2009-07-06 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-06 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-10 12:45 ` mitake
2009-07-10 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 13:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-12 7:23 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-12 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-13 6:06 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-13 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-14 0:48 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-18 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-07-01 12:40 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat II Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 9:48 ` [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090718132535.GC32618@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox