public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:33:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248213835.3298.112.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:03:55 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:17 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (clocksource-inline.diff)
> > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Remove clocksource_read, clocksource_enable and clocksource_disable
> > inline functions. No functional change.
> > 
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/time/clocksource.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
> >  kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   13 ++++++-------
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> There's a patch Magnus has that (should be) queued for 2.6.31 that makes
> unbreaks the mult_orig manipulations enable/disable does. I suspect this
> will cause this inline function removing to not be that much of a
> benefit.

After moving the enable/disable code over to clocksource.c there is no
reason for the inline function anymore, no?

> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ void clocksource_forward_now(void)
> >  	cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> >  	s64 nsec;
> > 
> > -	cycle_now = clocksource_read(clock);
> > +	cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> >  	cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> >  	clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
> > 
> > @@ -567,16 +567,19 @@ void change_clocksource(void)
> > 
> >  	clocksource_forward_now();
> > 
> > -	if (clocksource_enable(new))
> > +	if (new->enable && !new->enable(new))
> >  		return;
> > 
> > +	/* save mult_orig after successful enable */
> > +	new->mult_orig = new->mult;
> > +
> >  	new->raw_time = clock->raw_time;
> >  	old = clock;
> >  	clock = new;
> > -	clocksource_disable(old);
> > +	if (old->disable)
> > +		old->disable(old);
> 
> 	mult_orig needs to be saved to mult at this point.

Yes, it would make sense to do that. The old code doesn't so I did not
want to add it in a cleanup patch. That should be a patch on its own.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-22  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-21 19:17 [RFC][patch 0/5] clocksource cleanup / improvement Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 1/5] move clock source related code to clocksource.c Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:50   ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 21:55     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:00     ` john stultz
2009-07-22  7:25       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-22 17:45         ` john stultz
2009-07-23  0:28           ` john stultz
2009-07-23  7:53             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23 10:52             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-25  0:08               ` john stultz
2009-07-27 11:55                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23  7:23           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 2/5] cleanup clocksource selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:07   ` john stultz
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:48   ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 22:03   ` john stultz
2009-07-22  7:33     ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 4/5] clocksource_read/clocksource_read_raw " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:01   ` john stultz
2009-07-22  7:29     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 5/5] update clocksource with stop_machine Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox