From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:33:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248213835.3298.112.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:03:55 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:17 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (clocksource-inline.diff)
> > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > Remove clocksource_read, clocksource_enable and clocksource_disable
> > inline functions. No functional change.
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 13 ++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
>
> There's a patch Magnus has that (should be) queued for 2.6.31 that makes
> unbreaks the mult_orig manipulations enable/disable does. I suspect this
> will cause this inline function removing to not be that much of a
> benefit.
After moving the enable/disable code over to clocksource.c there is no
reason for the inline function anymore, no?
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ void clocksource_forward_now(void)
> > cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> > s64 nsec;
> >
> > - cycle_now = clocksource_read(clock);
> > + cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> > cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
> >
> > @@ -567,16 +567,19 @@ void change_clocksource(void)
> >
> > clocksource_forward_now();
> >
> > - if (clocksource_enable(new))
> > + if (new->enable && !new->enable(new))
> > return;
> >
> > + /* save mult_orig after successful enable */
> > + new->mult_orig = new->mult;
> > +
> > new->raw_time = clock->raw_time;
> > old = clock;
> > clock = new;
> > - clocksource_disable(old);
> > + if (old->disable)
> > + old->disable(old);
>
> mult_orig needs to be saved to mult at this point.
Yes, it would make sense to do that. The old code doesn't so I did not
want to add it in a cleanup patch. That should be a patch on its own.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 19:17 [RFC][patch 0/5] clocksource cleanup / improvement Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 1/5] move clock source related code to clocksource.c Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:50 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 21:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:00 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-22 17:45 ` john stultz
2009-07-23 0:28 ` john stultz
2009-07-23 7:53 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23 10:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-25 0:08 ` john stultz
2009-07-27 11:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 2/5] cleanup clocksource selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:07 ` john stultz
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:48 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 22:03 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:33 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 4/5] clocksource_read/clocksource_read_raw " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:01 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 5/5] update clocksource with stop_machine Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox